SLV vs. COLO
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and COLO (Global X MSCI Colombia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while COLO is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 14.35%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for COLO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for COLO.
Performance
SLV vs. COLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than COLO's 24.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed COLO with an annualized return of 14.35%, while COLO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.13% annualized return.
SLV
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 92.51%
- 3Y*
- 41.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
COLO
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 23.53%
- YTD
- 24.92%
- 6M
- 24.58%
- 1Y
- 63.49%
- 3Y*
- 35.46%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.13%
SLV vs. COLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -1.47% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF | 24.92% | 68.88% | 4.68% | 24.92% | -21.32% | -11.50% | -14.60% | 30.42% | -19.88% | 11.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and COLO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2009 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. COLO — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
COLO
SLV vs. COLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLV | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.59 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 9.71 | -5.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLV vs. COLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, roughly equal to the maximum COLO drawdown of -78.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and COLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -78.91% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.40% | -17.79% | -27.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.40% | -18.35% | -27.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.40% | -43.86% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.40% | -62.75% | +17.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.90% | -15.20% | -24.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -40.28% | -4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.03% | 6.56% | +14.47% |
Volatility
SLV vs. COLO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.50% compared to Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) at 11.44%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.50% | 11.44% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.14% | 20.36% | +38.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.02% | 23.09% | +36.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.51% | 23.37% | +13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.02% | 25.47% | +6.55% |
SLV vs. COLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than COLO's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. COLO - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF | 6.01% | 7.51% | 6.08% | 6.99% | 12.55% | 2.32% | 3.23% | 3.04% | 3.03% | 1.83% | 1.48% | 1.58% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and COLO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.50%) compared to COLO (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs COLO's -78.91%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 14.35% vs 7.13% for COLO. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, COLO has been the lower-risk option at 11.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 14.35% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for COLO.
COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.01%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while COLO is Latin America Equities. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.62% for COLO.
COLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and COLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer