PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLV vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 15.55%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.85% annualized return.


SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and ACWI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.28

SLV vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLV
ACWI

Basic Materials

100.0%
3.7%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

16.1%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

29.4%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Basic Materials

SLV
100.0%
ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

SLV

-

ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SLV

-

ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

SLV

-

ACWI
5.0%

Energy

SLV

-

ACWI
4.2%

Financial Services

SLV

-

ACWI
16.1%

Healthcare

SLV

-

ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

SLV

-

ACWI
10.9%

Real Estate

SLV

-

ACWI
1.8%

Technology

SLV

-

ACWI
29.4%

Utilities

SLV

-

ACWI
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVACWIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.29

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

3.17

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.01

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

13.53

-7.88

SLV vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.29

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.71

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.75

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.43

-0.18

Drawdowns

SLV vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-56.00%

-20.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

-9.73%

-32.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-16.55%

-25.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

-26.42%

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

-33.53%

-9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.30%

-0.83%

-36.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-8.61%

-36.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.67%

2.16%

+17.51%

Volatility

SLV vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.30%

3.93%

+12.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.31%

10.29%

+48.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.90%

12.78%

+46.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.15%

16.05%

+20.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.84%

17.11%

+14.73%

SLV vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLV vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLV and ACWI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 12.85% for ACWI. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 12.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SLV is categorized as Silver, while ACWI is Global Equities. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer