SLTY vs. IWO
SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index. SLTY is actively managed, while IWO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWO.
Performance
SLTY vs. IWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly lower than IWO's 18.58% return.
SLTY
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWO
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 18.58%
- 6M
- 15.22%
- 1Y
- 39.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
SLTY vs. IWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | -6.43% | -12.17% |
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 18.58% | 9.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLTY and IWO is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLTY vs. IWO — Risk / Return Rank
SLTY
IWO
SLTY vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLTY | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.21 | 0.29 | -1.50 |
Drawdowns
SLTY vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, smaller than the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and IWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLTY | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -60.11% | +39.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.82% | 0.00% | -17.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -16.70% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility
SLTY vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLTY | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 21.33% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 24.49% | -6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 24.13% | -5.75% |
SLTY vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLTY vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison
SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.58%, more than IWO's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.58% | 29.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLTY and IWO have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.
SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 74.58%, compared with 0.39% for IWO.
SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while IWO is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 0.24% for IWO.
Find the right allocation for SLTY and IWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer