SLTY vs. HIBL
SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while HIBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). SLTY is actively managed, while HIBL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for HIBL.
Performance
SLTY vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 96.27% return.
SLTY
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBL
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 38.56%
- YTD
- 96.27%
- 6M
- 98.56%
- 1Y
- 279.13%
- 3Y*
- 62.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SLTY vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | -6.01% | -12.17% |
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 96.27% | 42.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLTY and HIBL is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLTY vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank
SLTY
HIBL
SLTY vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLTY | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.19 | 0.24 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
SLTY vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and HIBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLTY | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -88.27% | +67.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.45% | -2.25% | -15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -44.20% | +30.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.55% | — |
Volatility
SLTY vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLTY | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 66.16% | -47.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 82.16% | -63.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 91.89% | -73.47% |
SLTY vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLTY vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison
SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.24%, more than HIBL's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.18% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.24% | 29.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLTY and HIBL have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.
SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 74.24%, compared with 1.18% for HIBL.
SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 1.12% for HIBL.
Find the right allocation for SLTY and HIBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer