SLTY vs. GDXY
SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GDXY is a Gold fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for GDXY.
Performance
SLTY vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -8.50% return, which is significantly higher than GDXY's -20.92% return.
SLTY
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -8.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXY
- 1D
- -3.28%
- 1M
- -15.24%
- 6M
- -27.34%
- YTD
- -20.92%
- 1Y
- 10.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLTY vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.50% | -12.61% |
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | -20.92% | 29.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLTY and GDXY is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLTY vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank
SLTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDXY
SLTY vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLTY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLTY vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum GDXY drawdown of -36.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and GDXY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLTY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -36.52% | +15.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.05% | -36.52% | +16.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -7.77% | -6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.39% | — |
Volatility
SLTY vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLTY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 39.10% | -21.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 32.59% | -14.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 32.59% | -14.85% |
SLTY vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXY's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLTY vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison
SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.52%, less than GDXY's 90.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | 90.05% | 52.13% | 23.91% |
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 88.52% | 29.68% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLTY and GDXY have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDXY is cheaper at 1.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDXY is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.
GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 90.05%, compared with 88.52% for SLTY.
SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXY is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 1.08% for GDXY.
Find the right allocation for SLTY and GDXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer