SLPAX vs. NINLX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SLPAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund) and NINLX (Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SLPAX returned 10.65%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for NINLX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLPAX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for NINLX.

Performance

SLPAX vs. NINLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund (SLPAX) and Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLPAX achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly lower than NINLX's 23.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SLPAX has underperformed NINLX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while NINLX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.

SLPAX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 16.44%
• 6M: 14.24%
• 1Y: 31.10%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 7.67%
• 10Y*: 10.65%

NINLX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 23.42%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 54.93%
• 3Y*: 19.54%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 13.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLPAX vs. NINLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLPAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund	16.44%	9.96%	16.62%	11.43%	-17.21%	24.76%	13.08%	23.74%	-11.25%	9.33%
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund	23.42%	18.20%	7.62%	13.89%	-20.22%	26.42%	27.14%	24.92%	-10.56%	16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SLPAX and NINLX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2007	0.95

The correlation between SLPAX and NINLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SLPAX vs. NINLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLPAX

SLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 56
SLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

NINLX

NINLX Risk / Return Rank: 87
NINLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
NINLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NINLX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NINLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NINLX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLPAX vs. NINLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund (SLPAX) and Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLPAX	NINLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.70	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.47	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.43	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.49	6.06	-2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.87	21.52	-9.65

SLPAX vs. NINLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the NINLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLPAX and NINLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLPAX vs. NINLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLPAX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, which is greater than NINLX's maximum drawdown of -59.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLPAX and NINLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLPAX	NINLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.12%	-59.95%	-7.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.48%	-9.39%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.04%	-26.46%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.86%	-28.71%	-12.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	-44.43%	+1.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.56%	+1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.39%	-9.89%	-7.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	2.63%	+0.14%

Volatility

SLPAX vs. NINLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund (SLPAX) is 5.40%, while Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that SLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NINLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLPAX	NINLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	7.43%	-2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.71%	15.41%	-2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.66%	21.08%	-3.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.77%	21.88%	+4.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.97%	23.17%	+1.80%

SLPAX vs. NINLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLPAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than NINLX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLPAX vs. NINLX - Dividend Comparison

SLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.37%, more than NINLX's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund	3.45%	4.25%	0.92%	0.25%	3.76%	6.40%	1.62%	2.85%	14.51%	5.19%	1.42%	5.22%
SLPAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund	23.37%	27.06%	3.82%	0.81%	8.25%	31.45%	4.90%	6.38%	27.71%	10.28%	3.54%	12.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLPAX and NINLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SLPAX and NINLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SLPAX or NINLX?

NINLX has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SLPAX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLPAX dropped -67.12% vs NINLX's -59.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NINLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.