SLON vs. SSO
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
SLON vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -73.75% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 17.32% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -7.63%
- 1M
- 21.56%
- 6M
- -79.21%
- YTD
- -73.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 1Y
- 37.37%
- 3Y*
- 32.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- 23.27%
SLON vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -73.75% | -62.89% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 17.32% | 16.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and SSO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SSO
SLON vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLON | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLON vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -84.67% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.07% | -3.10% | -91.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -19.49% | -47.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.40% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.87% | 25.05% | +122.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 147.87% | 33.87% | +114.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.87% | 35.88% | +111.99% |
SLON vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.87%, more than SSO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 21.87% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and SSO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 21.87%, compared with 0.67% for SSO.
SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.87% for SSO.
Find the right allocation for SLON and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer