SLON vs. SETH
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares - SLON tracks the Bloomberg Solana Index while SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.
Performance
SLON vs. SETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -77.64% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 48.48% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -11.08%
- 1M
- -37.46%
- YTD
- -77.64%
- 6M
- -77.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 19.90%
- YTD
- 48.48%
- 6M
- 48.59%
- 1Y
- -6.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLON vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -77.64% | -62.89% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 48.48% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and SETH is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SETH
SLON vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLON | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLON vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than SETH's maximum drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and SETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -80.74% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.80% | -59.21% | -36.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -54.80% | -10.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.80% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.14% | 69.21% | +78.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 69.66% | +78.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 69.66% | +78.48% |
SLON vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.68%, more than SETH's 10.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.36% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 25.68% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and SETH have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 25.68%, compared with 10.36% for SETH.
SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.95% for SETH.
Find the right allocation for SLON and SETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer