SLON vs. EZBC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SLON tracks the Bloomberg Solana Index while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLON returned -91.50% vs -46.31% for EZBC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

SLON vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -73.34% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -26.62% return.

SLON

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: 2.08%
• 6M: -79.21%
• YTD: -73.34%
• 1Y: -91.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -2.11%
• 6M: -32.60%
• YTD: -26.62%
• 1Y: -46.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-73.34%	-62.89%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-26.62%	-27.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and EZBC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.87

The correlation between SLON and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SLON vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLON

SLON Risk / Return Rank: 3
SLON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SLON Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SLON Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SLON Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SLON Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLON	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	-1.05	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.31	-1.59	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.82	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	-0.87	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	-1.40	+0.18

SLON vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLON Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLON and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLON vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLON	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.31%	-53.35%	-42.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.31%	-53.35%	-42.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.99%	-48.92%	-46.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.19%	-17.75%	-49.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.75%	33.13%	+41.62%

Volatility

SLON vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) has a higher volatility of 36.69% compared to Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) at 10.76%. This indicates that SLON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLON	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.69%	10.76%	+25.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	105.49%	34.80%	+70.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	147.41%	44.30%	+103.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	147.12%	49.84%	+97.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	147.12%	49.84%	+97.28%

SLON vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLON vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.54%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	21.54%	5.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLON and EZBC in my portfolio?

SLON and EZBC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLON or EZBC?

SLON has higher volatility (36.69%) compared to EZBC (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLON dropped -96.31% vs EZBC's -53.35%.

Which ETF is better, SLON or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, EZBC leads with -46.31% vs -91.50% for SLON. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLON or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, EZBC has performed better with a -46.31% return vs -91.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLON or EZBC?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLON or EZBC?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 21.54%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between SLON and EZBC?

SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.