PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLON vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLON vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -77.64% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.70% return.


SLON

1D
-11.08%
1M
-37.46%
YTD
-77.64%
6M
-77.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOXX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
-77.64%-62.89%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.70%2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and BOXX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLON vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLON

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLONBOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

8.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

58.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

496.82

SLON vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLON vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and BOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLONBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.31%

-0.12%

-96.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.80%

-0.02%

-95.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.32%

-0.00%

-65.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

Volatility

SLON vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLONBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.14%

0.32%

+147.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

148.14%

0.37%

+147.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

148.14%

0.37%

+147.77%

SLON vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLON vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.68%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
25.68%5.74%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLON and BOXX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOXX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOXX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 25.68%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BOXX is Ultrashort Bond. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while BOXX tracks Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.19% for BOXX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLON and BOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer