SLON vs. ACLO
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. SLON is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.
Performance
SLON vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.21% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -9.37%
- 1M
- -30.10%
- YTD
- -74.41%
- 6M
- -81.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLON vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -74.41% | -62.58% |
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and ACLO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
ACLO
SLON vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLON | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 5.10 | -5.74 |
Drawdowns
SLON vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and ACLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.19% | -1.01% | -94.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.19% | 0.00% | -95.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.84% | -0.05% | -63.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.78% | 0.73% | +146.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 1.08% | +145.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 1.08% | +145.70% |
SLON vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than ACLO's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 22.44% | 5.74% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and ACLO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 4.91% for ACLO.
SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and TCW. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.20% for ACLO.
Find the right allocation for SLON and ACLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer