SLMCX vs. FELIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX).
SLMCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 22, 1983. FELIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
SLMCX vs. FELIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLMCX vs. FELIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 0.17% | 37.32% | 26.67% | 44.27% | -31.14% | 38.97% | 44.45% | 54.15% | -8.12% | 34.08% |
FELIX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I | 0.34% | 45.25% | 44.10% | 75.49% | -34.88% | 57.89% | 44.02% | 64.21% | -12.52% | 34.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLMCX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than FELIX's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SLMCX has underperformed FELIX with an annualized return of 22.20%, while FELIX has yielded a comparatively higher 29.99% annualized return.
SLMCX
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 58.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.20%
FELIX
- 1D
- -4.25%
- 1M
- -9.99%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 77.58%
- 3Y*
- 38.40%
- 5Y*
- 28.12%
- 10Y*
- 29.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLMCX vs. FELIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLMCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FELIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLMCX vs. FELIX — Risk / Return Rank
SLMCX
FELIX
SLMCX vs. FELIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLMCX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.94 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 2.55 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 4.18 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 15.94 | -2.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLMCX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.94 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.75 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.88 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.40 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLMCX and FELIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLMCX vs. FELIX - Dividend Comparison
SLMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.44%, more than FELIX's 6.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 9.44% | 9.45% | 14.27% | 5.16% | 9.42% | 11.75% | 10.40% | 11.44% | 12.33% | 11.15% | 8.19% | 10.79% |
FELIX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I | 6.49% | 6.51% | 6.44% | 3.15% | 3.09% | 4.14% | 4.43% | 1.04% | 19.34% | 9.50% | 0.55% | 10.37% |
Drawdowns
SLMCX vs. FELIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLMCX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, roughly equal to the maximum FELIX drawdown of -71.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMCX and FELIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLMCX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.10% | -71.17% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -17.09% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.32% | -46.02% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -46.02% | +8.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.96% | -14.65% | +2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -21.27% | +8.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 4.49% | -0.56% |
Volatility
SLMCX vs. FELIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) is 9.50%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that SLMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLMCX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 10.51% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 24.76% | -3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.59% | 39.67% | -9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 37.96% | -12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 34.34% | -8.41% |