SLMCX vs. FELAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX).
SLMCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 22, 1983. FELAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
SLMCX vs. FELAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLMCX vs. FELAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 5.76% | 37.32% | 26.67% | 44.27% | -31.14% | 38.97% | 44.45% | 54.15% | -8.12% | 34.08% |
FELAX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A | 7.43% | 44.88% | 43.74% | 75.08% | -35.07% | 57.50% | 43.57% | 63.76% | -12.76% | 34.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLMCX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than FELAX's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SLMCX has underperformed FELAX with an annualized return of 22.87%, while FELAX has yielded a comparatively higher 30.52% annualized return.
SLMCX
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 9.48%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 31.63%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 22.87%
FELAX
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 88.29%
- 3Y*
- 41.26%
- 5Y*
- 28.70%
- 10Y*
- 30.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLMCX vs. FELAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLMCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FELAX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLMCX vs. FELAX — Risk / Return Rank
SLMCX
FELAX
SLMCX vs. FELAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLMCX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 2.25 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 2.85 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 5.18 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.82 | 19.59 | -2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLMCX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.25 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.89 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.40 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLMCX and FELAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLMCX vs. FELAX - Dividend Comparison
SLMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, more than FELAX's 6.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 8.94% | 9.45% | 14.27% | 5.16% | 9.42% | 11.75% | 10.40% | 11.44% | 12.33% | 11.15% | 8.19% | 10.79% |
FELAX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A | 6.48% | 6.96% | 7.02% | 3.40% | 3.32% | 4.34% | 4.51% | 1.00% | 20.15% | 9.67% | 0.36% | 10.71% |
Drawdowns
SLMCX vs. FELAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLMCX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, roughly equal to the maximum FELAX drawdown of -71.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMCX and FELAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLMCX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.10% | -71.33% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -17.10% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.32% | -46.15% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -46.15% | +8.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -8.57% | +1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -22.02% | +8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 4.52% | -0.57% |
Volatility
SLMCX vs. FELAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) is 11.14%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that SLMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLMCX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.14% | 12.79% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.67% | 25.67% | -4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.99% | 40.20% | -9.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 38.07% | -12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 34.41% | -8.42% |