SLM vs. PSLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLM (SLM Corporation) is a stock, while PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Over the past 10 years, SLM returned 13.40%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for PSLV. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SLM vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SLM Corporation (SLM) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLM achieves a -19.57% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -1.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLM having a 13.40% annualized return and PSLV not far ahead at 13.97%.

SLM

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -3.95%
• YTD: -19.57%
• 6M: -27.38%
• 1Y: -32.54%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 3.86%
• 10Y*: 13.40%

PSLV

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 6M: 18.46%
• 1Y: 100.09%
• 3Y*: 41.73%
• 5Y*: 18.43%
• 10Y*: 13.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLM vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLM SLM Corporation	-19.57%	-0.20%	47.25%	18.70%	-13.47%	60.54%	40.89%	8.60%	-26.46%	2.54%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	-1.78%	145.08%	19.43%	-1.94%	2.74%	-14.13%	42.81%	16.99%	-11.83%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SLM and PSLV is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010	0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap SLM : $4.28B PSLV : $14.73B
EPS SLM : $3.63 PSLV : $13.57
PE Ratio SLM : 5.96 PSLV : 1.71
PEG Ratio SLM : 0.90 PSLV : 0.00
PS Ratio SLM : 1.98 PSLV : 218.98
PB Ratio SLM : 1.76 PSLV : 0.90
Total Revenue (TTM) SLM : $2.25B PSLV : $64.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) SLM : $1.09B PSLV : $404.67M
EBITDA (TTM) SLM : $599.19M PSLV : $8.21B

Return for Risk

SLM vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLM

SLM Risk / Return Rank: 10
SLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SLM Omega Ratio Rank: 9
SLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SLM Martin Ratio Rank: 10

PSLV

PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 79
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLM vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLM Corporation (SLM) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLM	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	1.72	-2.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.04	1.96	-3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.32	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	2.48	-3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	5.50	-6.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLM vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLM Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLM and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLM	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.88	1.72	-2.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.52	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.45	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.17	+0.07

Drawdowns

SLM vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLM drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than PSLV's maximum drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLM and PSLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLM	PSLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.50%	-79.38%	-15.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.06%	-40.65%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.06%	-40.65%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.06%	-40.65%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.79%	-42.79%	-9.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.19%	-36.11%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.89%	-58.15%	+28.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.28%	18.25%	+6.03%

Volatility

SLM vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SLM Corporation (SLM) is 7.55%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that SLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLM	PSLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.55%	16.57%	-9.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.13%	57.35%	-25.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.99%	58.49%	-21.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.79%	35.64%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.87%	31.14%	+5.73%

Dividends

SLM vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

SLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLM SLM Corporation	2.41%	1.92%	1.67%	2.30%	2.65%	1.02%	0.97%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLM and PSLV in my portfolio?

SLM and PSLV have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLM or PSLV?

PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to SLM (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLM dropped -94.50% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.