SLLAX vs. HFCGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLLAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund) and HFCGX (Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SLLAX returned 10.19%/yr vs 12.92%/yr for HFCGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLLAX charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for HFCGX.

Performance

SLLAX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLLAX having a 15.88% return and HFCGX slightly higher at 16.55%. Over the past 10 years, SLLAX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 10.19%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.92% annualized return.

SLLAX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 15.88%
• 6M: 15.29%
• 1Y: 31.42%
• 3Y*: 16.77%
• 5Y*: 7.25%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

HFCGX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 6.46%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 6M: 17.79%
• 1Y: 23.40%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 13.34%
• 10Y*: 12.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLLAX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund	15.88%	9.98%	13.04%	13.46%	-15.64%	25.33%	15.78%	23.55%	-13.26%	9.73%
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	16.55%	4.78%	31.45%	19.58%	-4.97%	29.94%	17.73%	20.70%	-21.39%	16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SLLAX and HFCGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009	0.90

The correlation between SLLAX and HFCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SLLAX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLLAX

SLLAX Risk / Return Rank: 50
SLLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SLLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SLLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SLLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SLLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

HFCGX

HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 43
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLLAX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLLAX	HFCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.78	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	2.60	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	2.95	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.98	9.70	+1.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLLAX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLLAX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLLAX	HFCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	1.78	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.56	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.50	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.39	+0.09

Drawdowns

SLLAX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLLAX drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLLAX and HFCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLLAX	HFCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-62.35%	+18.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.53%	-7.82%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.52%	-22.86%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.82%	-26.30%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.08%	-54.22%	+10.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	0.00%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.78%	-15.23%	+7.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.37%	+0.64%

Volatility

SLLAX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund (SLLAX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) at 4.56%. This indicates that SLLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLLAX	HFCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	4.56%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.45%	9.49%	+2.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.61%	12.96%	+4.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.87%	24.08%	-3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.20%	25.82%	-3.62%

SLLAX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLLAX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

SLLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	14.11%	0.38%	3.58%	26.58%	0.00%	0.00%	10.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.11%
SLLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund	9.24%	10.74%	14.01%	3.72%	0.84%	22.64%	0.18%	0.14%	16.14%	7.15%	0.15%	11.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLLAX and HFCGX in my portfolio?

SLLAX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLLAX or HFCGX?

SLLAX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to HFCGX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLLAX dropped -44.08% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.