PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLGN vs. IOSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLGN vs. IOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) and Innospec Inc. (IOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLGN achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than IOSP's 7.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SLGN has outperformed IOSP with an annualized return of 7.11%, while IOSP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.74% annualized return.


SLGN

1D
2.20%
1M
9.95%
6M
6.39%
YTD
12.61%
1Y
-16.56%
3Y*
0.28%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
7.11%

IOSP

1D
1.11%
1M
-5.74%
6M
3.17%
YTD
7.89%
1Y
-5.29%
3Y*
-4.67%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
6.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLGN vs. IOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
12.61%-21.11%16.80%-11.33%22.68%17.06%21.06%33.55%-18.44%16.08%
IOSP
Innospec Inc.
7.89%-28.94%-9.57%21.46%15.25%0.77%-11.00%69.43%-11.48%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SLGN and IOSP is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 1998

0.34

The correlation between SLGN and IOSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLGN:

$4.75B

IOSP:

$2.01B

EPS

SLGN:

$2.67

IOSP:

$4.59

PE Ratio

SLGN:

16.85

IOSP:

17.77

PS Ratio

SLGN:

0.73

IOSP:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLGN:

$6.58B

IOSP:

$1.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLGN:

$1.14B

IOSP:

$490.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

SLGN:

$842.47M

IOSP:

$162.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLGN vs. IOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLGN
SLGN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SLGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLGN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SLGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLGN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IOSP
IOSP Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLGN vs. IOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) and Innospec Inc. (IOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLGNIOSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.97

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.25

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

-0.55

-0.17

SLGN vs. IOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLGN Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the IOSP Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLGN and IOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLGN vs. IOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLGN drawdown since its inception was -86.14%, smaller than the maximum IOSP drawdown of -91.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGN and IOSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLGNIOSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.14%

-91.17%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.01%

-25.48%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.03%

-48.42%

+13.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.03%

-48.42%

+13.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.03%

-48.42%

+13.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.36%

-35.35%

+15.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-28.70%

+12.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.91%

12.22%

+11.69%

Volatility

SLGN vs. IOSP - Volatility Comparison

Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Innospec Inc. (IOSP) at 5.96%. This indicates that SLGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLGNIOSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.16%

5.96%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.83%

17.34%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.12%

23.90%

+9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.92%

26.61%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.93%

31.27%

-7.34%

Dividends

SLGN vs. IOSP - Dividend Comparison

SLGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than IOSP's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOSP
Innospec Inc.
2.19%2.23%1.41%1.14%1.24%1.28%1.15%0.99%1.44%1.09%0.98%1.12%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
1.82%1.98%1.46%1.59%1.23%1.31%1.29%1.42%1.69%1.22%1.33%1.19%

Financials

SLGN vs. IOSP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silgan Holdings Inc. and Innospec Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.56B
453.20M
(SLGN) Total Revenue
(IOSP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLGN vs. IOSP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silgan Holdings Inc. and Innospec Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
17.0%
27.3%
Portfolio components
SLGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.80M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

IOSP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Innospec Inc. reported a gross profit of 123.50M and revenue of 453.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

SLGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 134.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

IOSP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Innospec Inc. reported an operating income of 36.50M and revenue of 453.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

SLGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 63.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

IOSP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Innospec Inc. reported a net income of 30.40M and revenue of 453.20M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SLGN and IOSP have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLGN has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to IOSP (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGN dropped -86.14% vs IOSP's -91.17%.

IOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLGN and IOSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer