PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLGN vs. RS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLGN vs. RS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLGN achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 39.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SLGN has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 7.01%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.64% annualized return.


SLGN

1D
1.88%
1M
12.07%
YTD
5.77%
6M
4.96%
1Y
-21.21%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
7.01%

RS

1D
-1.20%
1M
8.62%
YTD
39.03%
6M
35.97%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
17.36%
5Y*
23.10%
10Y*
20.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLGN vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
5.77%-21.11%16.80%-11.33%22.68%17.06%21.06%33.55%-18.44%16.08%
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
39.03%9.12%-2.33%40.29%27.08%37.84%2.42%72.21%-15.12%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SLGN and RS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 1997

0.36

Fundamentals

EPS

SLGN:

$2.66

RS:

$14.01

PE Ratio

SLGN:

15.87

RS:

28.46

PS Ratio

SLGN:

0.68

RS:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLGN:

$6.58B

RS:

$14.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLGN:

$1.14B

RS:

$3.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

SLGN:

$842.47M

RS:

$1.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLGN vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLGN
SLGN Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SLGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLGN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SLGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLGN Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RS
RS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLGN vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLGNRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.24

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

1.39

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.87

2.41

-3.27

SLGN vs. RS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLGN Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the RS Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLGN and RS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLGN vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLGN drawdown since its inception was -86.14%, roughly equal to the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGN and RS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLGNRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.14%

-83.80%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.87%

-22.30%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.03%

-22.30%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.03%

-22.32%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.03%

-40.83%

+5.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.26%

-3.58%

-20.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-16.46%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.52%

12.90%

+11.62%

Volatility

SLGN vs. RS - Volatility Comparison

Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) have volatilities of 7.55% and 7.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLGNRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.55%

7.47%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.97%

17.48%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.55%

25.69%

+6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.75%

27.87%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.87%

29.64%

-5.77%

Dividends

SLGN vs. RS - Dividend Comparison

SLGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than RS's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
1.23%1.66%1.63%1.43%1.73%1.70%2.09%1.84%2.81%2.10%2.07%2.76%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
1.94%1.98%1.46%1.59%1.23%1.31%1.29%1.42%1.69%1.22%1.33%1.19%

Financials

SLGN vs. RS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silgan Holdings Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
1.56B
3.50B
(SLGN) Total Revenue
(RS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLGN vs. RS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silgan Holdings Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
17.0%
25.3%
Portfolio components
SLGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.80M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

RS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 885.40M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.

SLGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 134.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

RS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 176.20M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

SLGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 63.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

RS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SLGN and RS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLGN has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to RS (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGN dropped -86.14% vs RS's -83.80%.

RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLGN and RS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer