SLGN vs. CCK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) and Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).

Performance

SLGN vs. CCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) and Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLGN vs. CCK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc.	-0.87%	-21.11%	16.80%	-11.33%	22.68%	17.06%	21.06%	33.55%	-18.44%	16.08%
CCK Crown Holdings, Inc.	1.16%	25.87%	-9.13%	13.29%	-24.99%	11.26%	38.13%	74.50%	-26.10%	7.00%

Fundamentals

EPS SLGN : $2.95 CCK : $6.40
PE Ratio SLGN : 13.52 CCK : 16.23
PS Ratio SLGN : 0.66 CCK : 0.97
Total Revenue (TTM) SLGN : $6.43B CCK : $12.37B
Gross Profit (TTM) SLGN : $1.14B CCK : $2.27B
EBITDA (TTM) SLGN : $905.40M CCK : $2.01B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLGN achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than CCK's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SLGN has underperformed CCK with an annualized return of 5.62%, while CCK has yielded a comparatively higher 8.25% annualized return.

SLGN

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -17.54%
• YTD: -0.87%
• 6M: -6.61%
• 1Y: -20.97%
• 3Y*: -7.97%
• 5Y*: 0.47%
• 10Y*: 5.62%

CCK

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 7.96%
• 1Y: 16.39%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: 1.73%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SLGN vs. CCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLGN

SLGN Risk / Return Rank: 17
SLGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SLGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SLGN Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SLGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
SLGN Martin Ratio Rank: 22

CCK

CCK Risk / Return Rank: 60
CCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CCK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CCK Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLGN vs. CCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) and Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLGN	CCK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	0.63	-1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.69	1.08	-1.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.13	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	1.08	-1.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	2.32	-3.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLGN vs. CCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLGN Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the CCK Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLGN and CCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLGN	CCK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.65	0.63	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.06	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.28	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.08	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between SLGN and CCK is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SLGN vs. CCK - Dividend Comparison

SLGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than CCK's 1.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc.	2.03%	1.98%	1.46%	1.59%	1.23%	1.31%	1.29%	1.42%	1.69%	1.22%	1.33%	1.19%
CCK Crown Holdings, Inc.	1.09%	1.01%	1.21%	1.04%	1.07%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SLGN vs. CCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLGN drawdown since its inception was -86.14%, smaller than the maximum CCK drawdown of -98.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGN and CCK.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLGN	CCK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.14%	-98.20%	+12.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.54%	-16.35%	-17.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.71%	-48.28%	+14.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.71%	-48.28%	+14.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.01%	-16.27%	-12.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-29.25%	+12.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.25%	7.59%	+12.66%

Volatility

SLGN vs. CCK - Volatility Comparison

Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) at 8.54%. This indicates that SLGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLGN	CCK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.45%	8.54%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.71%	18.34%	+5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.60%	26.31%	+6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.31%	28.73%	-3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.66%	29.23%	-5.57%

Financials

SLGN vs. CCK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silgan Holdings Inc. and Crown Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SLGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 327.30M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.3%.

CCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 322.00M and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

SLGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 205.10M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.

CCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.00M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

SLGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 113.30M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

CCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 149.00M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.