PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLGFX vs. FAMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLGFX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund (SLGFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLGFX achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 11.96% return.


SLGFX

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
7.92%
6M
6.57%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
20.26%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*

FAMRX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
11.96%
6M
11.28%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
18.20%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLGFX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SLGFX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund
7.92%16.96%24.07%26.27%-17.23%26.17%20.70%31.07%-7.23%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
11.96%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SLGFX and FAMRX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.96

The correlation between SLGFX and FAMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLGFX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLGFX
SLGFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SLGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SLGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLGFX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund (SLGFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLGFXFAMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.77

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

11.97

-1.25

SLGFX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLGFX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLGFX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLGFX drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGFX and FAMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLGFXFAMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-58.65%

+24.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.33%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-15.35%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-26.00%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-2.00%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-12.30%

+7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.16%

-0.16%

Volatility

SLGFX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund (SLGFX) is 4.86%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that SLGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLGFXFAMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

5.78%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

11.15%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

13.26%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

14.81%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

15.29%

+4.34%

SLGFX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLGFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLGFX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

SLGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than FAMRX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.97%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%
SLGFX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund
5.10%5.48%4.81%1.26%4.49%1.28%1.21%1.59%2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SLGFX and FAMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAMRX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to SLGFX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGFX dropped -34.56% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLGFX and FAMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer