SLF vs. TROW
SLF (Sun Life Financial Inc.) and TROW (T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — SLF in Insurance - Diversified, TROW in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, SLF returned 13.18%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for TROW. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLF vs. TROW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLF achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than TROW's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SLF has outperformed TROW with an annualized return of 13.18%, while TROW has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.
SLF
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
TROW
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 8.69%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- -6.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
SLF vs. TROW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 25.30% | 9.72% | 19.48% | 17.77% | -12.89% | 29.71% | 1.55% | 42.69% | -16.37% | 11.18% |
TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 8.69% | -4.67% | 9.68% | 3.35% | -42.24% | 34.91% | 28.11% | 35.61% | -9.75% | 43.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLF and TROW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2000 | 0.49 |
The correlation between SLF and TROW shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SLF:
$30.85B
TROW:
$23.86B
SLF:
CA$6.22
TROW:
$9.80
SLF:
17.21
TROW:
11.19
SLF:
1.43
TROW:
3.26
SLF:
1.89
TROW:
2.21
SLF:
CA$39.40B
TROW:
$7.41B
SLF:
CA$20.48B
TROW:
$3.66B
SLF:
CA$4.74B
TROW:
$2.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLF vs. TROW — Risk / Return Rank
SLF
TROW
SLF vs. TROW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLF | TROW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.13 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 2.77 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLF vs. TROW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLF drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than TROW's maximum drawdown of -67.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF and TROW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLF | TROW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.60% | -67.43% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -19.76% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | -34.05% | +19.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.77% | -58.16% | +27.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.84% | -58.16% | +7.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -39.77% | +39.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -16.68% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | 8.02% | -1.12% |
Volatility
SLF vs. TROW - Volatility Comparison
Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) at 4.34%. This indicates that SLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TROW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLF | TROW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 4.34% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.14% | 17.09% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 23.79% | -3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 30.47% | -11.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 30.00% | -7.12% |
Dividends
SLF vs. TROW - Dividend Comparison
SLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than TROW's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 3.47% | 4.03% | 4.00% | 4.98% | 4.59% | 3.32% | 3.69% | 3.47% | 4.71% | 3.17% | 3.98% | 4.64% |
TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 4.66% | 4.96% | 4.39% | 4.53% | 4.40% | 3.72% | 2.38% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 2.17% | 2.87% | 5.71% |
Financials
SLF vs. TROW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLF vs. TROW - Profitability Comparison
SLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
TROW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
TROW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 680.50M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.7%.
SLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
TROW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a net income of 562.00M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLF and TROW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLF has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to TROW (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLF dropped -78.60% vs TROW's -67.43%.
SLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLF and TROW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer