SLF vs. TF.TO
SLF (Sun Life Financial Inc.) and TF.TO (Timbercreek Financial Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — SLF in Insurance - Diversified, TF.TO in Mortgage Finance. Over the past 5 years, SLF returned 12.61%/yr vs -1.19%/yr for TF.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLF vs. TF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SLF is traded in USD, while TF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the TF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLF achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than TF.TO's -1.47% return.
SLF
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
TF.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- -5.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- -1.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SLF vs. TF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 25.30% | 9.72% | 19.48% | 17.77% | -12.89% | 29.71% | 1.55% | 42.69% | -16.37% | 11.18% |
TF.TO Timbercreek Financial Corp. | -1.47% | 11.68% | 7.02% | 5.71% | -24.41% | 19.65% | -3.15% | 27.25% | -9.56% | 27.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLF and TF.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016 | 0.30 |
The correlation between SLF and TF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SLF:
$30.85B
TF.TO:
CA$545.34M
SLF:
CA$6.22
TF.TO:
CA$0.36
SLF:
17.21
TF.TO:
18.15
SLF:
1.43
TF.TO:
3.74
SLF:
1.89
TF.TO:
0.83
SLF:
CA$39.40B
TF.TO:
CA$145.73M
SLF:
CA$20.48B
TF.TO:
CA$79.48M
SLF:
CA$4.74B
TF.TO:
CA$55.87M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLF vs. TF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SLF
TF.TO
SLF vs. TF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLF | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.95 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | -0.30 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | -0.70 | +4.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLF vs. TF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLF drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than TF.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF and TF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLF | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.60% | -45.42% | -33.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -18.58% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | -26.64% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.77% | -37.57% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.10% | +10.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -9.16% | -7.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | 7.89% | -0.99% |
Volatility
SLF vs. TF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO) at 3.57%. This indicates that SLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLF | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 3.57% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.14% | 12.09% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 16.24% | +3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 19.52% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 20.43% | +2.45% |
Dividends
SLF vs. TF.TO - Dividend Comparison
SLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than TF.TO's 10.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 3.47% | 4.03% | 4.00% | 4.98% | 4.59% | 3.32% | 3.69% | 3.47% | 4.71% | 3.17% | 3.98% | 4.64% |
TF.TO Timbercreek Financial Corp. | 10.47% | 10.09% | 9.76% | 10.35% | 9.76% | 7.18% | 7.99% | 6.95% | 7.89% | 7.12% | 3.92% | 0.00% |
Financials
SLF vs. TF.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Timbercreek Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLF vs. TF.TO - Profitability Comparison
SLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
TF.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 22.05M and revenue of 39.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.
SLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
TF.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 17.68M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.
SLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
TF.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a net income of 10.37M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLF and TF.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SLF and TF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer