SLDR vs. VGLT
SLDR (Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) and VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - SLDR tracks the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index while VGLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLDR returned 2.45% vs -1.67% for VGLT. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SLDR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGLT.
Performance
SLDR vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLDR achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than VGLT's -3.26% return.
SLDR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.12%
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 1Y
- -1.67%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- -7.07%
- 10Y*
- -1.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.37K | $809.23K | $668.50K | |
| $95.69M | $98.86M | $108.97M |
SLDR vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 0.65% | 4.60% | 0.66% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -3.26% | 5.35% | -10.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLDR and VGLT is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SLDR and VGLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLDR vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank
SLDR
VGLT
SLDR vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLDR | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.00 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | -0.05 | +3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | -0.12 | +12.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLDR vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDR and VGLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLDR | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -46.18% | +45.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.87% | -7.03% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -38.64% | +38.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -15.26% | +15.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 3.19% | -2.95% |
Volatility
SLDR vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) is 0.51%, while Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that SLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLDR | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 2.24% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.02% | 6.31% | -5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34% | 8.47% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 14.45% | -13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 13.75% | -12.47% |
SLDR vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLDR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLDR vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison
SLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than VGLT's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 3.37% | 3.80% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.37% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLDR and VGLT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGLT has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to SLDR (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLDR dropped -0.87% vs VGLT's -46.18%.
On 1-year performance, SLDR leads with 2.45% vs -1.67% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLDR has performed better with a 2.45% return vs -1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SLDR.
VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 3.37% for SLDR.
SLDR tracks FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index, while VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SLDR and 0.03% for VGLT.
SLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLDR and VGLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer