SLDR vs. VGIT
SLDR (Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) and VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - SLDR tracks the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index while VGIT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLDR returned 2.81% vs 2.89% for VGIT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLDR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGIT.
Performance
SLDR vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLDR achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.51% return.
SLDR
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGIT
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.13%
SLDR vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 0.28% | 4.60% | 0.66% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | -0.51% | 7.34% | -2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLDR and VGIT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SLDR and VGIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLDR vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank
SLDR
VGIT
SLDR vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLDR | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.15 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 1.02 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 2.78 | +9.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLDR vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum VGIT drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDR and VGIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLDR | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -16.05% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.87% | -2.83% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -2.44% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -3.52% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 1.04% | -0.81% |
Volatility
SLDR vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) is 0.44%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that SLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLDR | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 1.10% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.85% | 2.48% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28% | 3.38% | -2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.25% | 5.39% | -4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.25% | 4.51% | -3.26% |
SLDR vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLDR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLDR vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison
SLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than VGIT's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 3.72% | 3.80% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.87% | 3.79% | 3.67% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLDR and VGIT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGIT has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to SLDR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLDR dropped -0.87% vs VGIT's -16.05%.
On 1-year performance, VGIT leads with 2.89% vs 2.81% for SLDR. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VGIT has performed better with a 2.89% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SLDR.
VGIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.72% for SLDR.
SLDR tracks FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SLDR and 0.03% for VGIT.
SLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLDR and VGIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer