PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLDAX vs. SBDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLDAX vs. SBDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) and SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLDAX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than SBDAX's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SLDAX has outperformed SBDAX with an annualized return of 1.67%, while SBDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.22% annualized return.


SLDAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.58%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
-2.71%
10Y*
1.67%

SBDAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.08%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLDAX vs. SBDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund
0.58%7.37%-2.78%8.14%-26.58%-2.80%16.56%21.45%-6.23%11.67%
SBDAX
SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund
0.08%5.70%0.02%4.02%-7.30%-0.55%3.76%5.90%0.87%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SLDAX and SBDAX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2012

0.48

The correlation between SLDAX and SBDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (10 years) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLDAX vs. SBDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLDAX
SLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SBDAX
SBDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SBDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SBDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLDAX vs. SBDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) and SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLDAXSBDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

2.39

-1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

3.35

-1.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.59

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.68

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

4.84

-1.13

SLDAX vs. SBDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLDAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the SBDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLDAX and SBDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLDAXSBDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.39

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.11

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.34

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.98

-0.76

Drawdowns

SLDAX vs. SBDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLDAX drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, which is greater than SBDAX's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDAX and SBDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLDAXSBDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-11.86%

-24.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-3.40%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-4.47%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-11.86%

-23.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

-11.86%

-24.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.82%

-1.97%

-17.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-1.87%

-8.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.18%

+0.87%

Volatility

SLDAX vs. SBDAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX) at 0.82%. This indicates that SLDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLDAXSBDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

0.82%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.50%

1.88%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.67%

2.31%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.15%

3.19%

+8.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.27%

3.56%

+7.71%

SLDAX vs. SBDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLDAX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SBDAX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLDAX vs. SBDAX - Dividend Comparison

SLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than SBDAX's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBDAX
SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund
2.17%2.74%1.78%1.26%1.38%1.35%1.87%2.21%1.98%1.99%2.23%2.79%
SLDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund
5.13%5.03%4.63%3.38%3.27%5.81%7.64%3.79%4.26%4.41%4.22%6.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLDAX and SBDAX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLDAX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to SBDAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLDAX dropped -36.12% vs SBDAX's -11.86%.

SBDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLDAX and SBDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer