SLCGX vs. SIEPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX) and Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX).
SLCGX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Sep 1, 1994. SIEPX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Sep 1, 1994.
Performance
SLCGX vs. SIEPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLCGX vs. SIEPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLCGX Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio | -13.55% | 22.74% | 40.67% | 38.79% | -28.77% | 32.60% | 28.67% | 51.18% | -0.28% | 30.32% |
SIEPX Saratoga International Equity Portfolio | 1.68% | 31.89% | 5.25% | 14.80% | -21.85% | 19.33% | 5.87% | 19.77% | -23.89% | 18.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLCGX achieves a -13.55% return, which is significantly lower than SIEPX's 1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SLCGX has outperformed SIEPX with an annualized return of 17.48%, while SIEPX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.14% annualized return.
SLCGX
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -13.55%
- 6M
- -11.98%
- 1Y
- 15.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.48%
SIEPX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 22.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- 6.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLCGX vs. SIEPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLCGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SIEPX's 2.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLCGX vs. SIEPX — Risk / Return Rank
SLCGX
SIEPX
SLCGX vs. SIEPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX) and Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLCGX | SIEPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.30 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.80 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.73 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.04 | 6.63 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLCGX | SIEPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.30 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.37 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.35 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.14 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLCGX and SIEPX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SLCGX vs. SIEPX - Dividend Comparison
SLCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.00%, while SIEPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLCGX Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio | 16.00% | 13.83% | 23.77% | 7.53% | 7.55% | 23.16% | 8.91% | 31.50% | 25.22% | 5.81% | 23.83% | 10.21% |
SIEPX Saratoga International Equity Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 0.83% | 0.31% | 0.41% | 1.79% | 1.97% | 0.58% | 0.03% | 0.63% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
SLCGX vs. SIEPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.04%, which is greater than SIEPX's maximum drawdown of -62.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLCGX and SIEPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLCGX | SIEPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.04% | -62.81% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.18% | -11.88% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.13% | -35.31% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | -46.47% | +15.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.25% | -8.57% | -6.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.00% | -24.17% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | 3.13% | +2.25% |
Volatility
SLCGX vs. SIEPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX) is 6.60%, while Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that SLCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIEPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLCGX | SIEPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 7.94% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 11.14% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.33% | 17.24% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 16.28% | +5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 17.60% | +4.37% |