SLANX vs. AAAZX

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

SLANX (DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A) and AAAZX (DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund) are both mutual funds - SLANX is a Latin America Equities fund managed by DWS, while AAAZX is a Global Allocation fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, SLANX returned 9.84%/yr vs 7.17%/yr for AAAZX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SLANX charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AAAZX.

Performance

SLANX vs. AAAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLANX achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly higher than AAAZX's 10.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SLANX has outperformed AAAZX with an annualized return of 9.84%, while AAAZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.17% annualized return.

SLANX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.40%
• 6M: -2.13%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 1Y: 33.57%
• 3Y*: 11.09%
• 5Y*: 8.89%
• 10Y*: 9.84%
• ALL TIME*: 9.32%

AAAZX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.54%
• 6M: 3.00%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 11.02%
• 5Y*: 5.20%
• 10Y*: 7.17%
• ALL TIME*: 4.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SLANX vs. AAAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A	11.97%	54.13%	-28.52%	33.24%	8.08%	-9.06%	0.70%	35.56%	-2.82%	32.20%
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund	10.40%	13.14%	5.49%	2.64%	-9.57%	23.83%	3.91%	21.79%	-5.05%	14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SLANX and AAAZX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2007	0.63

The correlation between SLANX and AAAZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SLANX vs. AAAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLANX

SLANX Risk / Return Rank: 47
SLANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SLANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SLANX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SLANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SLANX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

AAAZX

AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 61
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLANX vs. AAAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLANX	AAAZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.78	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.43	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.84	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	7.69	-1.73

SLANX vs. AAAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLANX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the AAAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLANX and AAAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLANX vs. AAAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLANX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than AAAZX's maximum drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLANX and AAAZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLANX	AAAZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.73%	-40.45%	-30.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.70%	-5.78%	-7.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.63%	-10.06%	-19.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.92%	-22.52%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.91%	-29.44%	-21.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.12%	-3.06%	-5.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.20%	-6.60%	-16.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	2.13%	+3.66%

Volatility

SLANX vs. AAAZX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) at 2.01%. This indicates that SLANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLANX	AAAZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.13%	2.01%	+4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.38%	6.95%	+10.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.08%	9.27%	+12.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.17%	12.07%	+11.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	12.70%	+14.23%

SLANX vs. AAAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLANX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAZX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLANX vs. AAAZX - Dividend Comparison

SLANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than AAAZX's 6.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund	6.65%	4.15%	2.85%	2.40%	4.50%	2.62%	1.60%	2.07%	1.89%	1.79%	1.82%	2.53%
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A	3.71%	4.15%	5.13%	3.14%	7.15%	14.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.21%	1.57%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLANX and AAAZX in my portfolio?

SLANX and AAAZX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLANX or AAAZX?

SLANX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to AAAZX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLANX dropped -70.73% vs AAAZX's -40.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.