SKYY vs. JETS
SKYY (First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund) and JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKYY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index, while JETS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Jets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKYY returned 16.26%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for JETS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
SKYY vs. JETS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYY achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than JETS's 5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SKYY has outperformed JETS with an annualized return of 16.26%, while JETS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.62% annualized return.
SKYY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
JETS
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 5.20%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
SKYY vs. JETS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 3.03% | 9.20% | 35.87% | 52.18% | -44.68% | 10.62% | 57.77% | 25.25% | 6.01% | 33.47% |
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 5.20% | 11.64% | 33.21% | 11.42% | -19.01% | -5.13% | -28.93% | 14.38% | -14.30% | 18.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYY and JETS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | 0.47 |
The correlation between SKYY and JETS shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SKYY vs. JETS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKYY
JETS
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SKYY
JETS
Communication Services
SKYY
JETS
-
Consumer Cyclical
SKYY
JETS
Healthcare
SKYY
JETS
-
Industrials
SKYY
JETS
Basic Materials
SKYY
-
JETS
-
Consumer Defensive
SKYY
-
JETS
-
Energy
SKYY
-
JETS
-
Financial Services
SKYY
-
JETS
-
Real Estate
SKYY
-
JETS
-
Utilities
SKYY
-
JETS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYY vs. JETS — Risk / Return Rank
SKYY
JETS
SKYY vs. JETS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) and U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKYY | JETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.19 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 1.37 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 3.47 | -2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKYY vs. JETS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYY drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, smaller than the maximum JETS drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYY and JETS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYY | JETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -64.92% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.39% | -24.13% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.80% | -35.21% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.20% | -42.84% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.20% | -64.92% | +11.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.63% | -12.35% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -25.16% | +14.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.34% | 9.47% | +2.87% |
Volatility
SKYY vs. JETS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) and U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) have volatilities of 13.09% and 13.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYY | JETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 13.04% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.88% | 25.44% | -1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.45% | 33.42% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 32.49% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 34.26% | -7.36% |
SKYY vs. JETS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SKYY and JETS have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
SKYY vs. JETS - Dividend Comparison
SKYY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 0.79% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 1.24% | 0.09% | 1.57% | 0.58% | 0.17% |
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.27% | 0.35% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYY and JETS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYY has higher volatility (13.09%) compared to JETS (13.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYY dropped -53.20% vs JETS's -64.92%.
On 10-year performance, SKYY leads with 16.26% vs 3.62% for JETS. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SKYY has performed better with a 16.26% return vs 3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKYY and JETS have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for SKYY.
SKYY is categorized as Technology Equities, while JETS is Industrials Equities. SKYY tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index, while JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and US Global.
JETS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYY and JETS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer