SKRE vs. MOO
SKRE (Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SKRE tracks the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry while MOO tracks the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SKRE returned -39.81% vs 13.06% for MOO. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. SKRE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
SKRE vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKRE achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 10.10% return.
SKRE
- 1D
- 4.58%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- -14.51%
- 6M
- -16.27%
- 1Y
- -39.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.07%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
SKRE vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SKRE Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF | -14.51% | -31.29% | -44.51% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 10.10% | 15.61% | -11.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKRE and MOO is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKRE vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
SKRE
MOO
SKRE vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF (SKRE) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKRE | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.17 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.55 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 3.88 | -5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKRE | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | 0.95 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.22 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
SKRE vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKRE drawdown since its inception was -75.30%, which is greater than MOO's maximum drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKRE and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKRE | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.30% | -69.53% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.06% | -8.45% | -40.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.27% | -17.50% | -54.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.26% | -16.97% | -30.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.67% | 3.37% | +29.30% |
Volatility
SKRE vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF (SKRE) has a higher volatility of 12.32% compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) at 4.08%. This indicates that SKRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKRE | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.32% | 4.08% | +8.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.62% | 10.57% | +21.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.92% | 13.88% | +33.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.73% | 17.12% | +38.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.73% | 18.19% | +37.54% |
SKRE vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKRE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKRE vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
SKRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than MOO's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.24% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
SKRE Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF | 0.30% | 0.26% | 3.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKRE and MOO have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKRE has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to MOO (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKRE dropped -75.30% vs MOO's -69.53%.
On 1-year performance, MOO leads with 13.06% vs -39.81% for SKRE. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MOO has performed better with a 13.06% return vs -39.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SKRE.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.30% for SKRE.
SKRE tracks S&P Regional Banks Select Industry, while MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SKRE and 0.55% for MOO.
MOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKRE and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer