SKRE vs. BUFH
SKRE (Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKRE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. SKRE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
SKRE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKRE achieves a -27.55% return, which is significantly lower than BUFH's 2.30% return.
SKRE
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -11.73%
- YTD
- -27.55%
- 6M
- -23.40%
- 1Y
- -47.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SKRE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SKRE Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF | -27.55% | -25.34% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.30% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKRE and BUFH is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKRE vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
SKRE
BUFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SKRE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF (SKRE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKRE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKRE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKRE drawdown since its inception was -76.50%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKRE and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKRE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.50% | -1.53% | -74.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.50% | -0.26% | -76.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.77% | -0.18% | -47.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.15% | — | — |
Volatility
SKRE vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKRE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.85% | 2.38% | +44.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.45% | 2.38% | +53.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.45% | 2.38% | +53.07% |
SKRE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKRE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKRE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
SKRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKRE Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF | 0.35% | 0.26% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKRE and BUFH have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SKRE is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SKRE is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
SKRE has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
SKRE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SKRE and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for SKRE and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer