SKOR vs. QLC
SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKOR returned 2.88%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for QLC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SKOR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.
Performance
SKOR vs. QLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SKOR has underperformed QLC with an annualized return of 2.88%, while QLC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.
SKOR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
QLC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
SKOR vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.45% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 10.69% | -1.25% | 4.38% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 12.12% | 23.26% | 26.71% | 26.02% | -17.21% | 28.46% | 13.64% | 24.51% | -8.12% | 21.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKOR and QLC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, SKOR and QLC have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKOR vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank
SKOR
QLC
SKOR vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKOR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.49 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.85 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 18.03 | -9.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKOR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.75 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.92 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.81 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.80 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
SKOR vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and QLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKOR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -35.86% | +19.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -8.84% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.11% | -18.49% | +15.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | -23.81% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.98% | -35.86% | +19.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.09% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -4.54% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 1.89% | -1.31% |
Volatility
SKOR vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is 0.84%, while FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that SKOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKOR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 2.89% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 9.52% | -7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 12.38% | -9.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 16.82% | -12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 18.42% | -13.52% |
SKOR vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SKOR vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison
SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than QLC's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.66% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKOR and QLC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLC has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to SKOR (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKOR dropped -15.98% vs QLC's -35.86%.
On 10-year performance, QLC leads with 14.84% vs 2.88% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLC has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 2.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.
SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.87% for QLC.
SKOR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SKOR and 0.25% for QLC.
QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKOR and QLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer