PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKOR vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKOR vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -2.40% return.


SKOR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.54%
6M
1.02%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
2.88%

GLDM

1D
0.11%
1M
-9.52%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKOR vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
0.54%7.99%4.42%7.64%-9.88%-1.40%8.84%10.69%1.56%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-2.40%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SKOR and GLDM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.35

The correlation between SKOR and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKOR vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKOR
SKOR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKOR vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SKORGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.00

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

2.87

+5.44

SKOR vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKOR and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SKOR vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKORGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-24.35%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-24.35%

+22.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.11%

-24.35%

+21.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.13%

-24.35%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-21.96%

+21.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-6.27%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

8.44%

-7.84%

Volatility

SKOR vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is 0.94%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that SKOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKORGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

7.73%

-6.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

23.93%

-21.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

27.15%

-24.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.43%

18.13%

-13.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

16.98%

-12.08%

SKOR vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SKOR vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
4.66%4.70%4.90%3.90%2.57%2.55%3.38%3.53%2.85%2.46%2.74%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKOR and GLDM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to SKOR (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKOR dropped -15.98% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.41% vs 1.74% for SKOR. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SKOR.

SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

SKOR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GLDM is Gold. SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SKOR and 0.10% for GLDM.

SKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKOR and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer