SKHL vs. QTAP

Last updated Jul 29, 2026

SKHL (Direxion Daily SK Hynix Bull 2X ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SKHL is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SKHL charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

SKHL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily SK Hynix Bull 2X ETF (SKHL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SKHL

• 1D: -11.82%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: 11.64%
• YTD: 12.54%
• 1Y: 17.99%
• 3Y*: 18.43%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	$216.19K	$147.54K	$200.63K
SKHL Direxion Daily SK Hynix Bull 2X ETF	$18.07M	$16.88M	$16.88M

SKHL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SKHL Direxion Daily SK Hynix Bull 2X ETF	-49.35%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	-1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SKHL and QTAP is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2026	0.03

Return for Risk

SKHL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKHL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 96
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKHL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SK Hynix Bull 2X ETF (SKHL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SKHL	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.84	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.53	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.65	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.26	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	32.64	—

Drawdowns

SKHL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKHL drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKHL and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKHL	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.35%	-29.44%	-19.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.49%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.35%	-1.95%	-47.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.05%	-4.92%	-23.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SKHL	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	235.16%	6.37%	+228.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	235.16%	18.92%	+216.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	235.16%	18.57%	+216.59%

SKHL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKHL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SKHL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither SKHL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKHL and QTAP in my portfolio?

SKHL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SKHL or QTAP?

On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SKHL or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for SKHL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SKHL or QTAP?

SKHL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SKHL and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for SKHL and 0.79% for QTAP.