SKF vs. XTAP
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SKF is passively managed, while XTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SKF returned -15.11%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for XTAP. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. SKF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
SKF vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than XTAP's 10.96% return.
SKF
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- -24.34%
- 5Y*
- -15.11%
- 10Y*
- -25.91%
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
SKF vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 15.68% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -30.15% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 17.58% | 14.26% | 23.46% | -14.68% | 11.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and XTAP is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | -0.73 |
The correlation between SKF and XTAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.73 (5 years) to -0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SKF vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
XTAP
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SKF
XTAP
Basic Materials
SKF
-
XTAP
Communication Services
SKF
-
XTAP
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
XTAP
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
XTAP
Energy
SKF
-
XTAP
Healthcare
SKF
-
XTAP
Industrials
SKF
-
XTAP
Real Estate
SKF
-
XTAP
Technology
SKF
-
XTAP
Utilities
SKF
-
XTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
XTAP
SKF vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKF | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 2.22 | -1.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 14.82 | -14.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 78.70 | -78.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKF | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 4.50 | -4.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.76 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 0.80 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
SKF vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -22.13% | -77.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.76% | -1.42% | -19.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.09% | -11.83% | -56.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.40% | -22.13% | -50.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.95% | -0.21% | -99.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.26% | -3.45% | -85.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.13% | 0.27% | +10.86% |
Volatility
SKF vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.10%. This indicates that SKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 1.10% | +5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.80% | 3.16% | +18.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.85% | 4.70% | +24.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.03% | 14.54% | +21.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.90% | 14.41% | +26.49% |
SKF vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKF vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.09% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and XTAP have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKF has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 5-year performance, XTAP leads with 10.99% vs -15.11% for SKF. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 10.99% return vs -15.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKF.
SKF has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKF and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer