SKF vs. DIVO
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKF is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. SKF is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SKF returned -17.96%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for DIVO. At a correlation of -0.77, they often move in opposite directions. SKF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
SKF vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.40% return.
SKF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- -10.08%
- 3Y*
- -27.28%
- 5Y*
- -17.96%
- 10Y*
- -27.50%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SKF vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 2.60% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -47.66% | -42.40% | -42.97% | 16.42% | -31.70% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.40% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and DIVO is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | -0.77 |
The correlation between SKF and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
SKF vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
DIVO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SKF
DIVO
Basic Materials
SKF
-
DIVO
Communication Services
SKF
-
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
DIVO
Energy
SKF
-
DIVO
Healthcare
SKF
-
DIVO
Industrials
SKF
-
DIVO
Real Estate
SKF
-
DIVO
-
Technology
SKF
-
DIVO
Utilities
SKF
-
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
DIVO
SKF vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 2.93 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 10.48 | -11.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -30.04% | -69.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.02% | -5.95% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.09% | -12.12% | -55.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.40% | -13.72% | -58.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.95% | -1.61% | -98.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.27% | -2.60% | -86.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.95% | 1.66% | +8.29% |
Volatility
SKF vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.94%. This indicates that SKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 2.94% | +5.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.47% | 7.14% | +15.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.21% | 9.21% | +20.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.04% | 11.95% | +24.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.82% | 14.82% | +26.00% |
SKF vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKF vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than DIVO's 6.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.61% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and DIVO have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKF has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to DIVO (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.94% vs -17.96% for SKF. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.94% return vs -17.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKF.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 4.61% for SKF.
SKF is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKF and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer