SKF vs. DFNL
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and DFNL (Davis Select Financial ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKF is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while DFNL is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Davis. SKF is passively managed, while DFNL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SKF returned -19.36%/yr vs 14.28%/yr for DFNL. Their -0.91 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SKF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for DFNL.
Performance
SKF vs. DFNL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than DFNL's 7.24% return.
SKF
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- 6M
- -11.53%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- -18.86%
- 3Y*
- -27.34%
- 5Y*
- -19.36%
- 10Y*
- -27.10%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.15%
DFNL
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 24.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.69M | $3.00M | $2.49M | |
| $327.82K | $374.40K | $433.73K |
SKF vs. DFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | -8.93% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -47.66% | -42.40% | -42.97% | 16.42% | -30.05% |
DFNL Davis Select Financial ETF | 7.24% | 28.59% | 28.56% | 14.45% | -8.45% | 31.25% | -4.97% | 27.37% | -11.59% | 20.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and DFNL is -0.88, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017 | -0.91 |
The correlation between SKF and DFNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SKF vs. DFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
DFNL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SKF
DFNL
Basic Materials
SKF
-
DFNL
-
Communication Services
SKF
-
DFNL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
DFNL
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
DFNL
-
Energy
SKF
-
DFNL
-
Healthcare
SKF
-
DFNL
-
Industrials
SKF
-
DFNL
Real Estate
SKF
-
DFNL
-
Technology
SKF
-
DFNL
Utilities
SKF
-
DFNL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. DFNL — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
DFNL
SKF vs. DFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.28 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 1.87 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 5.30 | -6.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. DFNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than DFNL's maximum drawdown of -44.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and DFNL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -44.51% | -55.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.59% | -12.94% | -17.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.38% | -16.05% | -53.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.53% | -26.27% | -47.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -0.29% | -99.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.33% | -7.57% | -81.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.93% | 4.55% | +8.38% |
Volatility
SKF vs. DFNL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) at 4.14%. This indicates that SKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 4.14% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.16% | 11.50% | +10.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.32% | 14.80% | +14.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.92% | 19.13% | +16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.78% | 22.50% | +18.28% |
SKF vs. DFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DFNL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKF vs. DFNL - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than DFNL's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNL Davis Select Financial ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 2.19% | 2.33% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 1.45% | 2.52% | 3.12% | 1.10% |
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.70% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and DFNL have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKF has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to DFNL (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs DFNL's -44.51%.
On 5-year performance, DFNL leads with 14.28% vs -19.36% for SKF. On fees, DFNL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, DFNL has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFNL has performed better with a 14.28% return vs -19.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFNL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKF.
SKF has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 1.27% for DFNL.
SKF is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DFNL is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Davis. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKF and 0.64% for DFNL.
DFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and DFNL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer