SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO
SKE.TO (Skeena Resources Limited) and AAUC.TO (Allied Gold Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SKE.TO in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, AAUC.TO in Gold. Over the past year, SKE.TO returned 105.64% vs 74.77% for AAUC.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKE.TO achieves a 24.20% return, which is significantly higher than AAUC.TO's 15.42% return.
SKE.TO
- 1D
- -5.20%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 24.20%
- 6M
- 39.91%
- 1Y
- 105.64%
- 3Y*
- 77.42%
- 5Y*
- 22.56%
- 10Y*
- 1.18%
AAUC.TO
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 18.43%
- 1Y
- 74.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SKE.TO Skeena Resources Limited | 24.20% | 160.80% | 93.80% | 0.94% |
AAUC.TO Allied Gold Corporation | 15.42% | 207.43% | -2.85% | -33.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKE.TO and AAUC.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
SKE.TO:
CA$4.92B
AAUC.TO:
CA$4.55B
SKE.TO:
-CA$2.12
AAUC.TO:
-CA$1.06
SKE.TO:
27.30
AAUC.TO:
13.59
SKE.TO:
CA$0.00
AAUC.TO:
CA$1.37B
SKE.TO:
-CA$1.08M
AAUC.TO:
CA$543.10M
SKE.TO:
-CA$88.04M
AAUC.TO:
CA$331.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SKE.TO
AAUC.TO
SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Skeena Resources Limited (SKE.TO) and Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKE.TO | AAUC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.70 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 2.14 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 2.68 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 7.32 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKE.TO | AAUC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.70 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.67 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKE.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than AAUC.TO's maximum drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKE.TO and AAUC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKE.TO | AAUC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -50.73% | -49.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.66% | -28.00% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.59% | -16.93% | -82.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.46% | -22.05% | -58.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.69% | 10.24% | +1.45% |
Volatility
SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Skeena Resources Limited (SKE.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.01% compared to Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO) at 11.73%. This indicates that SKE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAUC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKE.TO | AAUC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.01% | 11.73% | +6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.53% | 21.72% | +19.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.04% | 44.34% | +10.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.52% | 54.02% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.57% | 54.02% | +26.55% |
Dividends
SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SKE.TO nor AAUC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SKE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Skeena Resources Limited and Allied Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SKE.TO and AAUC.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SKE.TO and AAUC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer