AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO
AAUC.TO (Allied Gold Corporation) and MAU.TO (Montage Gold Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, AAUC.TO returned 74.77% vs 234.40% for MAU.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUC.TO achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly lower than MAU.TO's 58.40% return.
AAUC.TO
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 18.43%
- 1Y
- 74.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAU.TO
- 1D
- -5.50%
- 1M
- 17.05%
- YTD
- 58.40%
- 6M
- 81.98%
- 1Y
- 234.40%
- 3Y*
- 190.25%
- 5Y*
- 75.13%
- 10Y*
- —
AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUC.TO Allied Gold Corporation | 15.42% | 207.43% | -2.85% | -33.14% |
MAU.TO Montage Gold Corp | 58.40% | 375.00% | 192.96% | 31.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUC.TO and MAU.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
AAUC.TO:
CA$4.55B
MAU.TO:
CA$5.70B
AAUC.TO:
-CA$1.06
MAU.TO:
-CA$0.11
AAUC.TO:
13.59
MAU.TO:
51.74
AAUC.TO:
CA$1.37B
MAU.TO:
CA$0.00
AAUC.TO:
CA$543.10M
MAU.TO:
-CA$994.60K
AAUC.TO:
CA$331.27M
MAU.TO:
-CA$36.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AAUC.TO
MAU.TO
AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO) and Montage Gold Corp (MAU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAUC.TO | MAU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.51 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 9.16 | -6.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 29.52 | -22.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAUC.TO | MAU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 4.12 | -2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.10 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUC.TO drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, smaller than the maximum MAU.TO drawdown of -57.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUC.TO and MAU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUC.TO | MAU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.73% | -57.89% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.00% | -25.76% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.93% | -8.10% | -8.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -25.64% | +3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.24% | 8.00% | +2.24% |
Volatility
AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO) is 11.73%, while Montage Gold Corp (MAU.TO) has a volatility of 19.97%. This indicates that AAUC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUC.TO | MAU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.73% | 19.97% | -8.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.72% | 46.37% | -24.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.34% | 57.30% | -12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.02% | 53.90% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.02% | 54.41% | -0.39% |
Dividends
AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither AAUC.TO nor MAU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AAUC.TO vs. MAU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allied Gold Corporation and Montage Gold Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AAUC.TO and MAU.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AAUC.TO and MAU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer