PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO) and Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUC.TO achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly lower than ORE.TO's 47.46% return.


AAUC.TO

1D
1.97%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
15.42%
6M
18.43%
1Y
74.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ORE.TO

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.85%
YTD
47.46%
6M
57.23%
1Y
81.25%
3Y*
26.81%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AAUC.TO
Allied Gold Corporation
15.42%207.43%-2.85%-33.14%
ORE.TO
Orezone Gold Corporation
47.46%176.56%-24.71%-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUC.TO and ORE.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023

0.36

The correlation between AAUC.TO and ORE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAUC.TO:

CA$4.55B

ORE.TO:

CA$1.75B

EPS

AAUC.TO:

-CA$1.06

ORE.TO:

CA$0.14

PS Ratio

AAUC.TO:

3.12

ORE.TO:

3.45

PB Ratio

AAUC.TO:

13.59

ORE.TO:

3.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAUC.TO:

CA$1.37B

ORE.TO:

CA$478.80M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAUC.TO:

CA$543.10M

ORE.TO:

CA$224.13M

EBITDA (TTM)

AAUC.TO:

CA$331.27M

ORE.TO:

CA$235.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAUC.TO
AAUC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AAUC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAUC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAUC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AAUC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAUC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ORE.TO
ORE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ORE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ORE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO) and Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAUC.TOORE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.48

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

5.06

+2.26

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAUC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the ORE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAUC.TO and ORE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAUC.TOORE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.31

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.13

+0.54

Drawdowns

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUC.TO drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, smaller than the maximum ORE.TO drawdown of -95.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUC.TO and ORE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAUC.TOORE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-95.63%

+44.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.00%

-32.99%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.93%

-48.21%

+31.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-71.00%

+48.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.24%

16.29%

-6.05%

Volatility

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO) is 11.73%, while Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO) has a volatility of 14.97%. This indicates that AAUC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ORE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAUC.TOORE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.73%

14.97%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

46.78%

-25.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.34%

62.47%

-18.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.02%

58.40%

-4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.02%

63.93%

-9.91%

Dividends

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AAUC.TO nor ORE.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allied Gold Corporation and Orezone Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
387.65M
182.89M
(AAUC.TO) Total Revenue
(ORE.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

AAUC.TO vs. ORE.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allied Gold Corporation and Orezone Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
42.2%
51.1%
Portfolio components
AAUC.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 163.71M and revenue of 387.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.2%.

ORE.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 93.46M and revenue of 182.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.1%.

AAUC.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 95.78M and revenue of 387.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

ORE.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 85.37M and revenue of 182.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.7%.

AAUC.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corporation reported a net income of -57.37M and revenue of 387.65M, resulting in a net margin of -14.8%.

ORE.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported a net income of 38.91M and revenue of 182.89M, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAUC.TO and ORE.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAUC.TO and ORE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer