SJNK vs. IBHH
SJNK (SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) and IBHH (iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SJNK tracks the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index while IBHH tracks the Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SJNK returned 8.31%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for IBHH. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SJNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHH.
Performance
SJNK vs. IBHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJNK achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than IBHH's 1.81% return.
SJNK
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
IBHH
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJNK vs. IBHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 1.65% | 7.68% | 8.24% | 11.63% | -2.37% |
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.81% | 8.02% | 7.53% | 12.87% | -6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJNK and IBHH is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SJNK and IBHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJNK vs. IBHH — Risk / Return Rank
SJNK
IBHH
SJNK vs. IBHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SJNK | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 4.62 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 18.44 | -4.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SJNK vs. IBHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJNK drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, which is greater than IBHH's maximum drawdown of -12.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJNK and IBHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJNK | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -12.05% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.73% | -1.22% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.77% | -4.66% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.11% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | -2.27% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.31% | +0.09% |
Volatility
SJNK vs. IBHH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) at 0.67%. This indicates that SJNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJNK | IBHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.67% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 2.11% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23% | 2.79% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.84% | 7.21% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.47% | 7.21% | -0.74% |
SJNK vs. IBHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SJNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SJNK vs. IBHH - Dividend Comparison
SJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than IBHH's 6.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.26% | 6.39% | 6.93% | 6.65% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.00% | 7.12% | 7.47% | 7.20% | 5.85% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 5.64% | 5.69% | 5.64% | 5.65% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SJNK and IBHH have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SJNK has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to IBHH (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJNK dropped -19.74% vs IBHH's -12.05%.
On 3-year performance, IBHH leads with 8.68% vs 8.31% for SJNK. On fees, IBHH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHH has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBHH has performed better with a 8.68% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SJNK.
SJNK has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 6.26% for IBHH.
SJNK tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index, while IBHH tracks Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SJNK and 0.35% for IBHH.
IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJNK and IBHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer