PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJNK vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJNK vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SJNK having a 1.65% return and BIL slightly higher at 1.70%. Over the past 10 years, SJNK has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 5.65%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.


SJNK

1D
0.08%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.65%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
8.31%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
5.65%

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJNK vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SJNK
SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
1.65%7.68%8.24%11.63%-5.50%5.06%5.82%9.49%-0.27%5.27%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.70%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SJNK and BIL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012

-0.00

The correlation between SJNK and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJNK vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJNK
SJNK Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SJNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SJNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJNK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJNK vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SJNKBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-170.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

87.41

-86.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

353.28

-350.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

2,801.37

-2,787.38

SJNK vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJNK and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SJNK vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJNK drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJNK and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJNKBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.74%

-0.78%

-18.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-0.01%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-0.01%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.18%

-0.09%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.74%

-0.21%

-19.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-0.26%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.00%

+0.40%

Volatility

SJNK vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that SJNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJNKBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.07%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

0.14%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

0.20%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

0.26%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

0.26%

+6.21%

SJNK vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SJNK vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

SJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than BIL's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
SJNK
SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.00%7.12%7.47%7.20%5.85%4.21%5.34%5.64%5.69%5.64%5.65%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


SJNK and BIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SJNK has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJNK dropped -19.74% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, SJNK leads with 5.65% vs 2.21% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SJNK has performed better with a 5.65% return vs 2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SJNK.

SJNK has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 3.85% for BIL.

SJNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BIL is Government Bonds. SJNK tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SJNK and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.43 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJNK and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer