PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJLD vs. BBSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJLD vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJLD achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than BBSB's 0.46% return.


SJLD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBSB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.63%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJLD vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SJLD
SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF
1.71%5.20%0.91%
BBSB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF
0.46%5.12%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SJLD and BBSB is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJLD vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJLD
SJLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SJLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SJLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSB
BBSB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BBSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJLD vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SJLDBBSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.48

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

3.48

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.13

13.90

+6.22

SJLD vs. BBSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the BBSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJLD and BBSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SJLD vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJLD drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum BBSB drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJLD and BBSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJLDBBSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-1.57%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.04%

-0.86%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.26%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-0.31%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.21%

+0.02%

Volatility

SJLD vs. BBSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) is 0.29%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) has a volatility of 0.41%. This indicates that SJLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJLDBBSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

0.41%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.16%

0.90%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

1.28%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.93%

1.66%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.93%

1.66%

+0.27%

SJLD vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJLD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SJLD vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison

SJLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than BBSB's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBSB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF
3.81%3.69%4.84%3.50%
SJLD
SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF
4.43%3.74%1.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SJLD and BBSB have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBSB has higher volatility (0.41%) compared to SJLD (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJLD dropped -1.04% vs BBSB's -1.57%.

On 1-year performance, SJLD leads with 4.58% vs 2.97% for BBSB. On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SJLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SJLD has performed better with a 4.58% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SJLD.

SJLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.81% for BBSB.

SJLD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BBSB is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SanJac Alpha and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SJLD and 0.04% for BBSB.

SJLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJLD and BBSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer