SJGIX vs. SEECX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SJGIX (Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund) and SEECX (Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SJGIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds, while SEECX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. Over the past 3 years, SJGIX returned 22.94%/yr vs 21.76%/yr for SEECX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SJGIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SEECX.

Performance

SJGIX vs. SEECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund (SJGIX) and Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SJGIX having a 11.16% return and SEECX slightly higher at 11.48%.

SJGIX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 6M: 11.73%
• 1Y: 21.78%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEECX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 6.09%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 27.07%
• 3Y*: 21.76%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: 14.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJGIX vs. SEECX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SJGIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund	11.16%	10.22%	30.89%	35.65%	-11.54%
SEECX Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund	11.48%	16.88%	23.50%	25.34%	-10.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SJGIX and SEECX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.96

The correlation between SJGIX and SEECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SJGIX vs. SEECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJGIX

SJGIX Risk / Return Rank: 26
SJGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SJGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SJGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SJGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SJGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SEECX

SEECX Risk / Return Rank: 63
SEECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SEECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SEECX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SEECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SEECX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJGIX vs. SEECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund (SJGIX) and Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SJGIX	SEECX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.35	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.20	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.43	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	3.07	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	13.84	-6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SJGIX vs. SEECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the SEECX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJGIX and SEECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SJGIX	SEECX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.35	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.48	+0.33

Drawdowns

SJGIX vs. SEECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJGIX drawdown since its inception was -24.53%, smaller than the maximum SEECX drawdown of -58.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJGIX and SEECX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJGIX	SEECX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.53%	-58.09%	+33.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-9.11%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.33%	-18.72%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	-9.64%	+3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	2.02%	+1.29%

Volatility

SJGIX vs. SEECX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund (SJGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX) at 2.85%. This indicates that SJGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJGIX	SEECX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	2.85%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.95%	9.01%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	11.90%	+3.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.49%	25.52%	-5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.49%	22.97%	-2.48%

SJGIX vs. SEECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJGIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SEECX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

SJGIX vs. SEECX - Dividend Comparison

SJGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than SEECX's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEECX Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund	3.24%	3.61%	8.47%	3.77%	50.97%	32.80%	9.47%	2.23%	5.64%	1.18%	0.94%	18.68%
SJGIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund	7.78%	8.64%	6.72%	0.39%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SJGIX and SEECX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SJGIX and SEECX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SJGIX or SEECX?

SJGIX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to SEECX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJGIX dropped -24.53% vs SEECX's -58.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEECX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.