SJGIX vs. SEACX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SJGIX (Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund) and SEACX (Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SJGIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds, while SEACX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. Over the past 3 years, SJGIX returned 22.92%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for SEACX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SJGIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for SEACX.

Performance

SJGIX vs. SEACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund (SJGIX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJGIX achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than SEACX's -0.01% return.

SJGIX

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 6.53%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.99%
• 1Y: 22.61%
• 3Y*: 22.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEACX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: -0.01%
• 6M: 0.03%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 3.79%
• 5Y*: 0.15%
• 10Y*: 1.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJGIX vs. SEACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SJGIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund	11.10%	10.22%	30.89%	35.65%	-11.54%
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund	-0.01%	6.50%	1.43%	5.54%	-8.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SJGIX and SEACX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.19

Return for Risk

SJGIX vs. SEACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJGIX

SJGIX Risk / Return Rank: 26
SJGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SJGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
SJGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SJGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SJGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SEACX

SEACX Risk / Return Rank: 18
SEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJGIX vs. SEACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund (SJGIX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SJGIX	SEACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.19	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.77	+0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.74	+0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.90	5.10	+1.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SJGIX vs. SEACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SEACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJGIX and SEACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SJGIX	SEACX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	1.19	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.67	+0.15

Drawdowns

SJGIX vs. SEACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJGIX drawdown since its inception was -24.53%, which is greater than SEACX's maximum drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJGIX and SEACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJGIX	SEACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.53%	-16.96%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-2.66%	-9.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.33%	-3.90%	-18.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.51%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.38%	-2.40%	-3.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	0.91%	+2.40%

Volatility

SJGIX vs. SEACX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund (SJGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) at 1.22%. This indicates that SJGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJGIX	SEACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.17%	1.22%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	2.64%	+9.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.28%	3.72%	+11.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.50%	4.85%	+15.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.50%	3.90%	+16.60%

SJGIX vs. SEACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJGIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SEACX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

SJGIX vs. SEACX - Dividend Comparison

SJGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than SEACX's 3.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund	3.34%	2.72%	2.78%	2.06%	1.67%	1.41%	1.86%	2.26%	2.22%	1.98%	2.18%	2.30%
SJGIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund	7.78%	8.64%	6.72%	0.39%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SJGIX and SEACX in my portfolio?

SJGIX and SEACX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SJGIX or SEACX?

SJGIX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to SEACX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJGIX dropped -24.53% vs SEACX's -16.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SJGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.