SEECX vs. SNTCX
SEECX (Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund) and SNTCX (Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SEECX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds, while SNTCX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. Over the past 10 years, SEECX returned 13.47%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for SNTCX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SEECX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for SNTCX.
Performance
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEECX achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than SNTCX's 15.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SEECX has outperformed SNTCX with an annualized return of 13.47%, while SNTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.30% annualized return.
SEECX
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 18.99%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.43%
SNTCX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 1Y
- 32.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEECX Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund | 8.89% | 16.88% | 23.50% | 25.34% | -19.71% | 30.59% | 12.83% | 29.49% | -6.99% | 21.34% |
SNTCX Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund | 15.30% | 33.58% | 8.58% | 17.60% | -11.61% | 10.82% | 4.89% | 18.97% | -13.17% | 23.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEECX and SNTCX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2006 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SEECX and SNTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEECX vs. SNTCX — Risk / Return Rank
SEECX
SNTCX
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX) and Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEECX | SNTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.96 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 11.13 | -3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEECX drawdown since its inception was -58.09%, roughly equal to the maximum SNTCX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEECX and SNTCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEECX | SNTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.09% | -60.58% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -10.60% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -15.26% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.66% | -27.08% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.66% | -39.33% | -3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | 0.00% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -15.97% | +6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.82% | -0.63% |
Volatility
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX) is 3.47%, while Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that SEECX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEECX | SNTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 4.37% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 13.58% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 15.88% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 17.43% | +8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 18.11% | +4.84% |
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEECX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SNTCX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Dividend Comparison
SEECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than SNTCX's 6.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEECX Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund | 3.31% | 3.61% | 8.47% | 3.77% | 50.97% | 32.80% | 9.47% | 2.23% | 5.64% | 1.18% | 0.94% | 18.68% |
SNTCX Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund | 6.82% | 7.86% | 18.31% | 4.23% | 3.17% | 4.75% | 3.96% | 2.59% | 2.47% | 2.27% | 2.29% | 4.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEECX and SNTCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNTCX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to SEECX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEECX dropped -58.09% vs SNTCX's -60.58%.
SNTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEECX and SNTCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer