SEECX vs. SNTCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX) and Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX).
SEECX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2004. SNTCX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2006.
Performance
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEECX Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund | -7.41% | 16.88% | 23.50% | 25.34% | -19.71% | 30.59% | 12.83% | 29.49% | -6.99% | 21.34% |
SNTCX Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund | -1.29% | 33.58% | 8.58% | 17.60% | -11.61% | 10.82% | 4.89% | 18.97% | -13.17% | 23.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEECX achieves a -7.41% return, which is significantly lower than SNTCX's -1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SEECX has outperformed SNTCX with an annualized return of 12.20%, while SNTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.10% annualized return.
SEECX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- YTD
- -7.41%
- 6M
- -5.58%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
SNTCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.59%
- YTD
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEECX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SNTCX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEECX vs. SNTCX — Risk / Return Rank
SEECX
SNTCX
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX) and Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEECX | SNTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.15 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.62 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.41 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 6.20 | -1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEECX | SNTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.15 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.53 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.50 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.20 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEECX and SNTCX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Dividend Comparison
SEECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than SNTCX's 7.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEECX Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund | 3.90% | 3.61% | 8.47% | 3.77% | 50.97% | 32.80% | 9.47% | 2.23% | 5.64% | 1.18% | 0.94% | 18.68% |
SNTCX Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund | 7.97% | 7.86% | 18.31% | 4.23% | 3.17% | 4.75% | 3.96% | 2.59% | 2.47% | 2.27% | 2.29% | 4.38% |
Drawdowns
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEECX drawdown since its inception was -58.09%, roughly equal to the maximum SNTCX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEECX and SNTCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEECX | SNTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.09% | -60.58% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | -13.26% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.66% | -27.08% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.66% | -39.33% | -3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.11% | -10.43% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -16.21% | +6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 3.02% | -0.45% |
Volatility
SEECX vs. SNTCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX) is 4.22%, while Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that SEECX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEECX | SNTCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 6.86% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 11.19% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 17.66% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.51% | 17.12% | +8.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 18.21% | +4.73% |