SJCP vs. WABF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SJCP (SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF) and WABF (Western Asset Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SJCP returned 4.55% vs 5.08% for WABF. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SJCP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WABF.

Performance

SJCP vs. WABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) and Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJCP achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than WABF's 0.21% return.

SJCP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 4.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WABF

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.21%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 5.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJCP vs. WABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SJCP SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF	0.70%	6.27%	-0.16%
WABF Western Asset Bond ETF	0.21%	7.92%	-3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SJCP and WABF is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

SJCP vs. WABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJCP

SJCP Risk / Return Rank: 58
SJCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SJCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SJCP Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SJCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SJCP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

WABF

WABF Risk / Return Rank: 37
WABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
WABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
WABF Omega Ratio Rank: 37
WABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
WABF Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJCP vs. WABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) and Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SJCP	WABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.35	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	2.01	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.24	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	1.68	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.71	5.16	+4.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SJCP vs. WABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJCP Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the WABF Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJCP and WABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SJCP	WABF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	1.35	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.65	1.00	+0.65

Drawdowns

SJCP vs. WABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJCP drawdown since its inception was -2.01%, smaller than the maximum WABF drawdown of -5.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJCP and WABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJCP	WABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-5.36%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.01%	-3.03%	+1.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-1.61%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.25%	-1.52%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	0.99%	-0.52%

Volatility

SJCP vs. WABF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) is 0.59%, while Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that SJCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJCP	WABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	1.08%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	2.47%	-0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43%	3.84%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.38%	6.01%	-3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.38%	6.01%	-3.63%

SJCP vs. WABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJCP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WABF's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SJCP vs. WABF - Dividend Comparison

SJCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than WABF's 5.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SJCP SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF	4.37%	4.05%	1.40%	0.00%
WABF Western Asset Bond ETF	5.13%	5.67%	6.25%	1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SJCP and WABF in my portfolio?

SJCP and WABF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SJCP or WABF?

WABF has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to SJCP (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJCP dropped -2.01% vs WABF's -5.36%.

Which ETF is better, SJCP or WABF?

On 1-year performance, WABF leads with 5.08% vs 4.55% for SJCP. On fees, WABF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SJCP has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SJCP or WABF?

Over the 1-year period, WABF has performed better with a 5.08% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SJCP or WABF?

WABF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SJCP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SJCP or WABF?

WABF has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.37% for SJCP.

What is the main difference between SJCP and WABF?

They also come from different issuers: SanJac Alpha and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SJCP and 0.35% for WABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SJCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.