SIZE vs. IMCB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB).

SIZE and IMCB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIZE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Low Size Index. It was launched on Apr 16, 2013. IMCB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both SIZE and IMCB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SIZE vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIZE vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF	-0.96%	10.51%	14.37%	17.78%	-15.86%	25.05%	16.26%	28.97%	-6.59%	18.76%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.14%	10.25%	15.10%	16.37%	-16.09%	22.81%	13.35%	31.49%	-11.53%	19.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIZE achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SIZE has outperformed IMCB with an annualized return of 10.95%, while IMCB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.

SIZE

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -5.50%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 6M: -0.01%
• 1Y: 11.37%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 7.22%
• 10Y*: 10.95%

IMCB

• 1D: 2.52%
• 1M: -5.47%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 14.21%
• 3Y*: 12.90%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIZE vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIZE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

SIZE

iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF

IMCB

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

Return for Risk

SIZE vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIZE

SIZE Risk / Return Rank: 38
SIZE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SIZE Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SIZE Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SIZE Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SIZE Martin Ratio Rank: 46

IMCB

IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 48
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 46
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIZE vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIZE	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.79	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	1.22	-0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.17	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	1.16	-0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	5.35	-1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIZE vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIZE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIZE and IMCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIZE	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	0.79	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.41	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.52	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.48	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between SIZE and IMCB is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SIZE vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

SIZE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than IMCB's 1.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF	1.56%	1.50%	1.53%	1.42%	1.59%	1.19%	1.43%	1.35%	2.43%	1.58%	1.88%	1.95%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.38%	1.42%	1.43%	1.55%	1.70%	1.08%	1.12%	1.32%	1.80%	1.31%	1.79%	1.47%

Drawdowns

SIZE vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIZE drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIZE and IMCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIZE	IMCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.15%	-58.80%	+19.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.78%	-12.92%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.03%	-25.15%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.15%	-40.99%	+1.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.59%	-5.73%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-7.79%	+3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	2.79%	-0.02%

Volatility

SIZE vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIZE	IMCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	5.32%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	9.96%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.91%	17.98%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	17.57%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.67%	19.63%	-0.96%