SIXZ vs. FLJJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIXZ (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF) and FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXZ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while FLJJ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIXZ returned 12.65% vs 15.29% for FLJJ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXZ achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than FLJJ's 4.98% return.

SIXZ

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 12.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLJJ

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 15.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIXZ AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF	6.18%	7.24%	10.54%
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	4.98%	11.35%	11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXZ and FLJJ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	0.87

The correlation between SIXZ and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXZ	FLJJ
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SIXZ vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXZ

SIXZ Risk / Return Rank: 67
SIXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SIXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SIXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SIXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SIXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXZ	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	3.02	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	4.67	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.65	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	3.98	-1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.82	20.87	-8.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXZ and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXZ	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	3.02	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	2.14	-0.63

Drawdowns

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXZ drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXZ and FLJJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXZ	FLJJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.27%	-6.91%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	-3.86%	-0.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.05%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-0.78%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	0.73%	+0.26%

Volatility

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) at 0.86%. This indicates that SIXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXZ	FLJJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	0.86%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.13%	3.59%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04%	5.10%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.79%	6.21%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.79%	6.21%	+1.58%

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXZ and FLJJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

SIXZ vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXZ nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXZ and FLJJ in my portfolio?

SIXZ and FLJJ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXZ or FLJJ?

SIXZ has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to FLJJ (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXZ dropped -10.27% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

Which ETF is better, SIXZ or FLJJ?

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 15.29% vs 12.65% for SIXZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXZ or FLJJ?

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 15.29% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXZ or FLJJ?

SIXZ and FLJJ have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXZ or FLJJ?

SIXZ and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SIXZ and FLJJ?

SIXZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FLJJ is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.