SIXZ vs. COMT
SIXZ (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXZ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIXZ returned 12.65% vs 47.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SIXZ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
SIXZ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXZ achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
SIXZ
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
SIXZ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SIXZ AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF | 6.18% | 7.24% | 10.54% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | -0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXZ and COMT is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SIXZ and COMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
SIXZ vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXZ
COMT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SIXZ
COMT
-
Financial Services
SIXZ
COMT
Communication Services
SIXZ
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
SIXZ
COMT
-
Healthcare
SIXZ
COMT
-
Industrials
SIXZ
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXZ
COMT
-
Energy
SIXZ
COMT
-
Utilities
SIXZ
COMT
-
Real Estate
SIXZ
COMT
-
Basic Materials
SIXZ
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXZ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
SIXZ
COMT
SIXZ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.40 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 5.95 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.82 | 14.11 | -1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.24 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.20 | +1.30 |
Drawdowns
SIXZ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXZ drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXZ and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -51.89% | +41.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.45% | -8.02% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -4.82% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -24.07% | +23.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 3.38% | -2.39% |
Volatility
SIXZ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) is 1.15%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SIXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 7.37% | -6.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.13% | 18.80% | -13.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.04% | 21.29% | -15.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.79% | 21.06% | -13.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.79% | 18.89% | -11.10% |
SIXZ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXZ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXZ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
SIXZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
SIXZ AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXZ and COMT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SIXZ (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXZ dropped -10.27% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 12.65% for SIXZ. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SIXZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXZ.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for SIXZ.
SIXZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXZ and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXZ and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer