PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXZ vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXZ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXZ achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


SIXZ

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.31%
YTD
6.18%
6M
6.65%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXZ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXZ and COMT is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024

-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SIXZ and COMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

SIXZ vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXZ
COMT

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

SIXZ
36.2%
COMT

-

Financial Services

SIXZ
11.9%
COMT
100.0%

Communication Services

SIXZ
10.9%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SIXZ
10.1%
COMT

-

Healthcare

SIXZ
8.4%
COMT

-

Industrials

SIXZ
8.1%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

SIXZ
4.9%
COMT

-

Energy

SIXZ
3.5%
COMT

-

Utilities

SIXZ
2.3%
COMT

-

Real Estate

SIXZ
1.9%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

SIXZ
1.8%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXZ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXZ
SIXZ Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SIXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXZ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXZCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

5.95

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

14.11

-1.29

SIXZ vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXZ and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXZCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.24

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.20

+1.30

Drawdowns

SIXZ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXZ drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXZ and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXZCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-51.89%

+41.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.45%

-8.02%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-4.82%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-24.07%

+23.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

3.38%

-2.39%

Volatility

SIXZ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) is 1.15%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SIXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXZCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

7.37%

-6.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

18.80%

-13.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04%

21.29%

-15.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.79%

21.06%

-13.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.79%

18.89%

-11.10%

SIXZ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXZ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXZ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

SIXZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
SIXZ
AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXZ and COMT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SIXZ (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXZ dropped -10.27% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 12.65% for SIXZ. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SIXZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXZ.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for SIXZ.

SIXZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXZ and 0.48% for COMT.

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXZ and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer