PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXS vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXS vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 16.28% return.


SIXS

1D
1.71%
1M
7.38%
6M
14.40%
YTD
19.15%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

VB

1D
0.31%
1M
0.76%
6M
8.76%
YTD
16.28%
1Y
25.42%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXS vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
19.15%4.59%5.85%14.92%-18.52%40.74%44.24%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
16.28%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%45.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and VB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXS and VB has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIXS vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXS
VB

Financial Services

24.2%
12.3%

Healthcare

16.9%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
3.1%

Utilities

10.5%
3.1%

Industrials

8.7%
20.6%

Real Estate

8.4%
7.5%

Technology

6.3%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
10.9%

Communication Services

5.3%
3.0%

Energy

2.1%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.7%

Financial Services

SIXS
24.2%
VB
12.3%

Healthcare

SIXS
16.9%
VB
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

SIXS
11.0%
VB
3.1%

Utilities

SIXS
10.5%
VB
3.1%

Industrials

SIXS
8.7%
VB
20.6%

Real Estate

SIXS
8.4%
VB
7.5%

Technology

SIXS
6.3%
VB
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXS
5.4%
VB
10.9%

Communication Services

SIXS
5.3%
VB
3.0%

Energy

SIXS
2.1%
VB
4.2%

Basic Materials

SIXS
1.1%
VB
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXS vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXS
SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXS vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXSVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

2.84

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.77

10.37

+1.41

SIXS vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXSVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.68%

-59.56%

+31.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-8.98%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-25.36%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-28.15%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.71%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-8.40%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.46%

-0.08%

Volatility

SIXS vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.38%. This indicates that SIXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXSVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

3.38%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

12.07%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

16.47%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

20.74%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

21.36%

-1.79%

SIXS vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXS vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than VB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
1.67%1.62%1.09%1.60%1.37%0.94%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.21%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXS and VB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXS has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to VB (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 5-year performance, VB leads with 8.31% vs 7.01% for SIXS. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VB has performed better with a 8.31% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.21% for VB.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.05% for VB.

SIXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXS and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer