SIXS vs. URNM
SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) and URNM (NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while URNM is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. SIXS is actively managed, while URNM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXS returned 3.28%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for URNM. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.
Performance
SIXS vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 11.97% return.
SIXS
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 16.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
URNM
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 52.67%
- 3Y*
- 27.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXS vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 5.36% | 4.59% | 5.85% | 14.92% | -18.52% | 40.74% | 43.41% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 11.97% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 54.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXS and URNM is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SIXS and URNM has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SIXS vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXS
URNM
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SIXS
URNM
-
Healthcare
SIXS
URNM
-
Utilities
SIXS
URNM
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXS
URNM
-
Real Estate
SIXS
URNM
-
Industrials
SIXS
URNM
-
Consumer Cyclical
SIXS
URNM
-
Communication Services
SIXS
URNM
-
Technology
SIXS
URNM
-
Energy
SIXS
URNM
Basic Materials
SIXS
URNM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXS vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
SIXS
URNM
SIXS vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.65 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.90 | 3.59 | +3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.03 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.32 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.67 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
SIXS vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and URNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.68% | -50.78% | +23.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -32.04% | +24.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.95% | -50.78% | +30.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | -50.78% | +23.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.19% | -26.82% | +22.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -18.03% | +9.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 14.71% | -12.34% |
Volatility
SIXS vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) is 3.53%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that SIXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 16.19% | -12.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 40.32% | -31.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.30% | 51.69% | -38.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 48.30% | -30.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 46.90% | -27.24% |
SIXS vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXS vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than URNM's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.94% | 0.45% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.84% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXS and URNM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNM has higher volatility (16.19%) compared to SIXS (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs URNM's -50.78%.
On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 15.58% vs 3.28% for SIXS. On fees, URNM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SIXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URNM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.
URNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.81% for SIXS.
SIXS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while URNM is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.85% for URNM.
SIXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXS and URNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer