PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXS vs. URNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXS vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 11.97% return.


SIXS

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.16%
1Y
16.34%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*

URNM

1D
-5.94%
1M
-7.38%
YTD
11.97%
6M
10.07%
1Y
52.67%
3Y*
27.00%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXS vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
5.36%4.59%5.85%14.92%-18.52%40.74%43.41%
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
11.97%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%78.32%54.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and URNM is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXS and URNM has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIXS vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXS
URNM

Financial Services

23.0%

-

Healthcare

16.2%

-

Utilities

12.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.8%

-

Real Estate

9.0%

-

Industrials

7.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%

-

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Technology

5.7%

-

Energy

2.7%
97.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
2.6%

Financial Services

SIXS
23.0%
URNM

-

Healthcare

SIXS
16.2%
URNM

-

Utilities

SIXS
12.1%
URNM

-

Consumer Defensive

SIXS
10.8%
URNM

-

Real Estate

SIXS
9.0%
URNM

-

Industrials

SIXS
7.3%
URNM

-

Consumer Cyclical

SIXS
6.4%
URNM

-

Communication Services

SIXS
5.9%
URNM

-

Technology

SIXS
5.7%
URNM

-

Energy

SIXS
2.7%
URNM
97.4%

Basic Materials

SIXS
1.0%
URNM
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXS vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXS
SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXS vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXSURNMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.65

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

3.59

+3.31

SIXS vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and URNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXSURNMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.03

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.32

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.67

+0.04

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and URNM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXSURNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.68%

-50.78%

+23.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-32.04%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-50.78%

+30.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-50.78%

+23.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-26.82%

+22.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.95%

-18.03%

+9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

14.71%

-12.34%

Volatility

SIXS vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) is 3.53%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that SIXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXSURNMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

16.19%

-12.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

40.32%

-31.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

51.69%

-38.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

48.30%

-30.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

46.90%

-27.24%

SIXS vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXS vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than URNM's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
1.81%1.62%1.09%1.60%1.37%0.94%0.45%
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
2.84%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXS and URNM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URNM has higher volatility (16.19%) compared to SIXS (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs URNM's -50.78%.

On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 15.58% vs 3.28% for SIXS. On fees, URNM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SIXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URNM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

URNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.81% for SIXS.

SIXS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while URNM is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.85% for URNM.

SIXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXS and URNM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer